From:
Elizabeth
To:
larry.m.mixson@bvs.com
Date: 2/27/98
9:29am
Subject: Internet and Identity
Good Morning.
"Every era constructs its own metaphors for psychological well being.
Not so long ago, stability was socially valued and culturally
reinforced. Rigid gender roles, repetitive labor, the expectation of
being in one kind of a job or remaining in one town over a lifetime, all
of these made consistency central to definitions of health. But these
stable social worlds have broken down. In our time, health is described
in terms of fluidity rather stability. What matters most now is the
ability to adapt and change--to new jobs, new career directions, new
gender roles, new technologies." Turkle. Chapter 10.
Sounds like our discussion.
"People who live parallel lives on the screen are nevertheless bound by
the desires, pain, and mortality of their physical selves....Some are
tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant, as escape or
meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there are serious
play." Turkle. Chapter 10.
We had serious threats of tornado weather so I rushed home in time to
try and pick up Turkle's book at the library. I've skim read most of it.
I have found it very interesting, although some of the more
technological discussions I skipped. Many of the "theorists" I studied,
but did not master, in graduate school. Having an online relationship
took on different meanings as I read about what children are doing in
the "chat rooms," as well as adults. People are really living "virtual"
lives. Is living a virtual life some type of oxymoron? I really enjoyed
the sections on identity, the notion of the unified self vs. the
fragmented self, vs. the postmodern self. Much of my self growth work
has been around the theme of "wholeness." One of the ideas I found
really intriguing from Peter Berger was home simplex vs. home duplex--an
integrated vs. a split self, Turkle also discusses MPD's, multiple
personality disorders, and how they are and are not like leading
different lives in cyberspace.
I'm sorry, I may be spoiling this book for you. One great advantage of a
scholarly book, as hers, is that she provides citations to many other
works, and some films. The "notes" are as interesting as the book. There
is one film I would like to try and find, but I forget the title just
now.
Haven't checked HM yet. Its so much easier to write/send on GW.
Later, possibly. EJ
Updated: 04-01-2024